Transport options in Leeds and the effect on social justice and immobility.
The lack of reliable, diverse transportation in Leeds is more than just a sustainability issue; it’s a profound social injustice. Transportation is a fundamental part of a city’s infrastructure, providing residents access to essential services, employment, education, and social opportunities. However, Leeds’ over-reliance on an inefficient and limited bus network disproportionately impacts marginalised groups, exacerbating social inequality and immobility.
Low-income communities in Leeds bear the brunt of the city’s inadequate transportation infrastructure. Many of these residents cannot afford private vehicles and are therefore entirely dependent on public transport (Robson, 2022). Yet, with buses often delayed or overcrowded, these individuals face significant barriers to accessing essential services. This restriction on mobility prevents individuals from pursuing job opportunities outside of their immediate area, limiting economic mobility and perpetuating cycles of poverty.
In a city where 80% of public transport users rely on buses, the absence of alternative transit options such as trams or light rail means that those without cars are at a disadvantage. A 2023 report by the West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA) indicates that Leeds’ bus system frequently fails to meet the needs of its users, with high levels of dissatisfaction due to unreliable service (Frame, 2022). When public transport is unreliable, individuals in low-income neighbourhoods are often forced to decline job opportunities due to the risk of not arriving on time, resulting in a reduced ability to escape poverty (Bastiaanssen et al, 2020).
The lack of transport diversity in Leeds has a direct impact on environmental health. Diesel-powered buses, the primary mode of public transport, emit pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter, which have been linked to respiratory and cardiovascular issues. Studies by Friends of the Earth (2022) highlight that communities living near major roads and bus routes are exposed to these harmful pollutants at higher levels, putting their health at risk (Holland et al., 2021).
According to Public Health England, air pollution is responsible for one in 20 deaths in urban areas across the UK (Public Health England, 2022). For communities in densely populated, low-income areas of Leeds, who are more likely to live near bus routes, this environmental burden is especially acute. This situation reflects an environmental justice issue, where marginalized communities experience greater exposure to environmental hazards due to systemic inequalities in infrastructure planning. The absence of cleaner alternatives like electric buses or trams exacerbates these health risks, trapping vulnerable communities in a cycle of environmental exposure and poor health (Greenfield, 2024).
The transportation system in Leeds also contributes to social exclusion, isolating individuals who are already marginalised. The lack of reliable public transport makes it difficult for people to participate in the social and cultural life of the city. This is especially true for elderly or disabled individuals who may find it challenging to navigate unreliable bus schedules. Without affordable and accessible options, these groups become excluded from communal spaces and social events, impacting their mental and emotional well-being.
Furthermore, the current system limits access to educational institutions for young people in low-income households. Inconsistent bus schedules mean that students may miss classes or struggle to arrive on time, impacting their academic performance and future prospects. This lack of accessibility prevents upward mobility for these individuals, widening the gap between wealthy and disadvantaged groups and perpetuating cycles of deprivation (Coughlan, 2017).
The current transport crisis in Leeds highlights a fundamental violation of the "right to mobility," which is the idea that all individuals should have equitable access to transportation as a means of fulfilling their basic needs and accessing opportunities. Mobility is a crucial factor in achieving social justice, as it enables individuals to seek employment, engage in education, and maintain social connections. Leeds’ reliance on an unreliable bus network effectively denies this right to many of its residents, deepening social and economic inequalities (Hidayati, Tan and Yamu, 2021).
Investing in a diverse transportation system that includes options like trams, electric buses, and dedicated cycling infrastructure would address many of these injustices. For example, a light rail system would not only reduce congestion and lower emissions but also provide a reliable, efficient mode of transportation that could serve all communities equitably. This shift toward a multi-modal system would support social justice by making it easier for all residents, especially those in low-income areas—to participate fully in city life, thereby enhancing their quality of life and breaking down barriers to opportunity.
The transportation challenges in Leeds reveal an ingrained issue of social and environmental injustice. As long as the city relies on a single, inefficient mode of public transport, vulnerable communities will continue to suffer from restricted mobility, poorer health outcomes, and limited economic opportunities. Addressing this injustice requires an urgent commitment to building a more equitable transportation infrastructure that serves all residents fairly. Leeds’ future as a sustainable, inclusive city hinges on this transformation, where all individuals can exercise their right to mobility and access the opportunities necessary for a better quality of life.
Reference list
Bastiaanssen, J., Johnson, D. and Lucas, K. (2020). Does transport help people to gain employment? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Transport Reviews, 40(5), pp.1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1747569.
Coughlan, S. (2017). Poor public transport puts rural schools out of reach. BBC News. [online] 17 Jan. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-38639888.
Frame, N. (2022). Scientist’s study shows that 80% of Leeds buses are late. [online] Yorkshire Evening Post. Available at: https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/transport/scientists-study-shows-that-80-of-leeds-buses-are-late-3824493 [Accessed 7 Nov. 2024].
Friends of the earth. (2022). Earthmatters Autumn 2022 | Friends of the Earth. [online] Friends of the Earth. Available at: https://friendsoftheearth.uk/about/earthmatters-autumn-2022 [Accessed 7 Nov. 2024].
Greenfield, D.E. (2024). Environmental Racism In Urban Planning: How Marginalized Communities Are Bearing The Brunt Of Pollution - Sigma Earth. [online] Sigma Earth. Available at: https://sigmaearth.com/environmental-racism-in-urban-planning-how-marginalized-communities-are-bearing-the-brunt-of-pollution/ [Accessed 7 Nov. 2024].
Hidayati, I., Tan, W. and Yamu, C. (2021). Conceptualizing Mobility Inequality: Mobility and Accessibility for the Marginalized. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(4), p.088541222110128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122211012898.
Holland, S.P., Mansur, E.T., Muller, N.Z. and Yates, A.J. (2021). The environmental benefits of transportation electrification: Urban buses. Energy Policy, 148, p.111921. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111921.
Robson, S. (2022). Northern cities risk ‘filling up’ with cars as ownership surges faster than population. [online] inews.co.uk. Available at: https://inews.co.uk/news/northern-cities-risk-filling-up-with-cars-as-ownership-surges-faster-than-population-1881918.